The phenomena supporting the rise of technocapitalism are of two basic
types. One typology includes macro
phenomena related to long-term accumulation.
A second typology includes micro phenomena involving processes of
diffusion and generation at the level of organizations and individuals.
The macro phenomena are found at the societal level, they are
collective and structural, and are best understood from a long-term
perspective. These phenomena are
largely out of the control of any single institution, organization or group of
individuals. Together, they form a
macro platform from which technocapitalism is emerging.
The rapid accumulation of inventions has been a major macro phenomenon
supporting technocapitalism. The number
of inventions patented during the second half of the twentieth century
increased to levels never seen before in human history. This unprecedented surge of inventive
creativity has been a major cause of the rise of technocapitalism.
The higher the number of patented inventions, the larger the stock of
patents that can potentially be used for some economic or social purpose. Intellectual property of new ideas and
discoveries became more valuable than ever during the second half of the
twentieth century. This phenomenon
provided a substantial increase in the societal innovative capacity that
resulted in the technological advancement of many fields (for insights on
innovative capacity and its effects, please visit www.innovativecapacity.com).
Second, the rapid massification of education during the second half of
the twentieth century, and particularly technological education, was another
macro phenomenon supporting the rise of technocapitalism. After the mid-1940s, access to higher
education came to be regarded as a right in many nations. Enrollment in higher education in science and
technology fields expanded as never before.
Now, a new frontier of massification---the spread of Internet-based
distance learning programs---is taking this massification process farther than
anyone could imagine barely two decades ago.
The third macro phenomenon supporting technocapitalism is the
unprecedented accumulation of infrastructure, both physical and intangible,
during the second half of the twentieth century. The construction of physical infrastructure involving educational
facilities, laboratories and communications, for example, reached unprecedented
levels, supporting the massification process noted above. Similarly, the development of intangible
infrastructure, such as the formation of communities and local networks
supportive of inventors and their lifestyles, became more obvious than ever.
The importance of infrastructure is often ignored or taken for granted
in most accounts of technological change.
However, its support of invention and innovation is a fundamental
one. Without the appropriate
infrastructure, none of the macro or micro phenomena supporting the emergence
of technocapitalism could operate effectively.
A fourth macro phenomenon is a new geography of invention and
innovation, involving radical changes from previous times. The second half of the twentieth century saw
in the United States a process whereby previously peripheral or undeveloped
areas became the most important sources of invention and innovation. At the same time, the prior predominant
national sources of invention declined and were overshadowed by the new
areas. Areas in Sunbelt states, such as
Silicon Valley, Southern California, Eastern Texas, North Carolina and Northern
Virginia, among others, became the most important national sources of invention
and innovation. In the short span of
four decades they displaced the previously predominant areas of Eastern New
York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Illinois.
This radical process of regional inversion was in part a product of the
rapid accumulation of inventions, infrastructure, and the massification of
education noted earlier. Internal
population migration toward Sunbelt states, along with the immigration of
highly skilled groups, helped this process.
Military research and related activities in some Sunbelt states also
contributed. The massive shift in the
geographical sourcing of invention and innovation resulting from this process
has not been replicated so far by any other nation in the world. It therefore remains an American
phenomenon. Perhaps in coming decades
we might witness a similar process of regional inversion in other nations (for
insights on related aspects of regional inversion, please visit www.regionalinversion.com).
The micro phenomena involve processes of diffusion and
generation of knowledge that can lead to invention and innovation. They occur largely at the level of
organizations and individuals.
Together, they constitute the micro-level platform that supports the
emergence of technocapitalism.
The rapid diffusion of knowledge experienced during the second half of
the twentieth century is a major phenomenon supporting technocapitalism. Knowledge became easier to diffuse and
acquire than ever before, thanks largely to the massification of education
discussed earlier. The diffusion of
technological knowledge, confined mostly to elites in previous times, thus
became a mass activity.
Despite its massive scope, the diffusion of knowledge remains largely a
function of organizations and individuals.
Knowledge, unlike information, usually requires much effort,
persistence, long periods of time to be acquired, and it confers in many cases
a lasting advantage. The second half of
the twentieth century, moreover, saw new inventions being put to work, such as
computers and the Internet, which made it easier and faster than ever for
organizations and individuals to diffuse new knowledge.
Second, the
corporatization of invention and the rising importance attached to corporate
R&D (research and development) became another micro phenomenon supporting
the rise of technocapitalism. The rate
of individual invention stagnated during the second half of the twentieth
century, but corporate invention surged to levels never seen before in
history. Thus, the rapid accumulation
of inventions of the second half of the twentieth century was largely a
corporate phenomenon.
The innovative capacity of organizations increased to unprecedented
levels during the last decades of the twentieth century, due to the rising
importance of R&D. This development
is, in part, behind the emergence of a new organizational form, the
experimentalist firm, that is a distinctive feature of technocapitalism. Experimentalist organizations are
overwhelmingly focused on research, and depend mostly on their discoveries for
survival. In this respect, therefore,
they implement what may be referred to as “systematized research regimes”,
which are oriented toward generating streams of new inventions and
innovations. The experimentalist
organization is, by and large, a product of the rising importance of corporate
R&D. A major concern regarding
these organizations is the increasing consolidation of firms through mergers
and acquisitions,
that lead to the formation of oligopolies with substantial market power
over their respective sectors.
The third micro phenomenon supporting the rise of technocapitalism is
the spread of continuous (or systematized) invention and innovation. This phenomenon has become most obvious in
the new sectors that are representative of technocapitalism, such as
biotechnology, software, synthetic bioengineering, nanotechnology and
bioinformatics. This is in part a
result of the corporatization of invention and the rising importance of
R&D. Although most continuous
innovation has occurred in corporate R&D units, the basic features of this
phenomenon now seem to be spilling over into other corporate activities,
including services. Thus, generating a continuous
stream of novelty is becoming an important objective for some of the most
common activities of our time.
Fourth, the rapid reproduction of creativity is another micro-level
feature supporting technocapitalism.
Technological creativity is not a constant attribute. It must be inspired, replenished and
sustained in individuals and organizations searching for new discoveries. This unremitting renewal can be called
reproduction, and it is not too different from the similarly named process that
takes place in nature.
This most difficult of human endeavors now occurs mostly in
organizations. In the organizations
typical of technocapitalism---the experimentalist organizations---practices to
improve and sustain the reproduction of creativity are a vital necessity. This imperative has led to new forms of
organizing and managing activities, which are quite different from those used
in the organizations that were typical of industrial capitalism. Reproducing creativity is one of the most
important objectives of those organizations, and it is one that increasingly
depends on external societal factors and stimuli. In this respect, reproducing creativity has become more of a
societal endeavor, which must be nurtured through external social mediation and
influences.
The rising importance of networks is the fifth micro phenomenon
supporting the rise of technocapitalism.
Networks are vital for reproducing creativity and continuous invention,
and also for diffusing new knowledge. A
major factor here is that most organizations cannot hope to possess internally
all the expertise and other resources needed to reproduce creativity, and
sustain continuous invention.
The expertise needed to reproduce creativity and sustain continuous
invention has become more complex and multidisciplinary than ever, and the
accompanying hardware more costly.
Therefore, organizations must reach out to find external resources
through networks. The rising importance
of alliances, joint ventures and outsourcing arrangements in many activities is
an effect of this phenomenon. Even in
the case of oligopolies, such alliances and outsourcing are important, as it is
impossible for a single organization to possess all the resources needed to
undertake research or reproduce creativity.
Networks and the Internet are also introducing changes in the way
invention and innovation are undertaken.
While initially they appeared to dilute the power of established
organizations in conventional sectors, networks and the Internet have also
provided the means for oligopolies to form and exercise greater market
control. New, innovative firms with
discoveries are increasingly being taken over by oligopolistic corporations, as
consolidation in some of the new sectors associated with technocapitalism
advances. As a result, more inventions
and innovations are coming under the control of large corporations with
substantial market power.
Some of the phenomena supporting technocapitalism, or their effects,
will be discussed in greater detail in other sections of this website.
For publications on these phenomena and related topics by this author,
please see the Publications
section of
this website.
Copyright © Luis
Suarez-Villa